Very interresting article on the matter in Nazi Dresden 23rd January, 2010 @ 13:50 Filed under
politics, society
, Personally ,
,
Nazi
,
Demo ,
freedom current events surrounding the trial, a large Nazi demonstration in Dresden to prevent a large blockade
, a prosecutor, which covers this initiative raids, arrests and prohibited and criminalized
, and a few totally nutty pirate party members who obviously have no idea who they are going there to hold her hand, by this initiative want to deny the support and thus prefer the Nazis as "tolerance idiot want to be helpful, sometimes almost a statement on the every now and then protect members' arguments, "any rights" for Nazis "to have a few thoughts that might help a few things about" tolerance "and" freedom "to get clear The argument is always making the same : You would not restrict the "freedom" and the Freedom of opinion, even if that meant that this was exploited by Nazis, and in the end is then always one with the stupid quote of "I like your views on contempt, but would die for it, that you may tell them," Yaddayaddayadda .
latter quote, however, reveals precisely Specimen flaw, which is here fallen into the trap: it is believed, far-right, Nazi and racist ideologies were only an "opinion". And spread the prevention of an event whose purpose is to show such an ideology, and bring into the company ergo the prevention of "free speech" is. Ah, and of course also fit the new thinking (TM), a passive resistance, as it is a block (and in the 80's for granted as repertoire for peaceful demonstrations included) is now the "violence" to reinterpret that now even state violence justifies the picture, demonstrators and organizers of demonstrations generally have been half the terrorists one by raids, arrests and prosecution pressure (I do not want to know how many people are there ready to listen now and bedbugs are), which always has been years in the public pressed, reinforced again - how far the message "stay away from demonstrations, because it is faster criminal can watch as it was already arranged successfully You can see that the fact that even members of one party, the word "pirate" as an ironic reminder of just this tendency to be criminalized is now faster than a government member is OK can scribble on a lobbying requirement to . fall for
A blockade is passive, ergo peaceful. Everything else is newspeak. I do not see that would have been with counter-demonstrations and blockades to stand as "strife" and thus a "violent event called. to "freedom" of the Nazis: I see an ideology, human rights, failed not only them but openly contradicts not as "opinion", which is covered by human rights. Nazi ideology is not an opinion but a crime.
tolerance does not mean having to tolerate their own abolition. On the contrary, it is said, to anyone who wants to abolish them to fight back. If possible peaceful. If necessary, by other means. As far as we are fortunately not. However, if even fridliche may no longer be used, so that intolerance may be disseminated freely, it will eventually be too late. Maybe even too late even for non-peaceful. Then you want it in the end did not know again, nothing may have indeed been made or not. We had this before, what people actually learn in history class now?
The supposedly two-edged sword to support also something that restricts the free speech of Nazis is just as long as two-edged sword, as long as you do not distinguish opinion and ideology. An opinion does not a man. When I look at the statistics right violence so I come to the conclusion that it is not here can be a mind. It is ideology, to action, instigation and at the end of murder and manslaughter.
be the way the people who defend the Nazis in their "freedom" of those same "tolerance idiot stated. And I do not come choice but to admit that I contain within a single point, which must agree to this, actually. Fortunately, this is really the only one. Ah, and "democrats" which is an insult to the enemy is referred to the system. Sorry, but I am not prepared to admit people the "freedom" that of all others, including abolishing the right to life. One can protect freedom in different ways to death. Once, removing himself liberties in order to avoid attacks of others. But even by the enemies of freedom can be used all the freedom to destroy them. I can not understand how someone of the stupidity of the logic of Security delusion recognizes and condemns the same stupidity and irrationality represents by those who abolish all want freedom, just admit the possibilities, and not notice that it so the other side is the same medal, with the same output: the abolition of civil and human rights and loss of freedom.
The freedom that we (still) have won is a freedom. Won a not always peaceful, one that from the one who wants to be free calls again and again to stand up for them, and against trends, they want to abolish defended, which will be fought again and again and needs. Freedom does not happen by doing nothing, freedom Rather, let's just lost by refusing, looking away and Grant. Read Next?
http://www.svenscholz.de/index.php/nazis-und-die-meinungsfreiheit/
0 comments:
Post a Comment