every year.
I did not expect to write something for golden rule. And I write on such matters only slightly, if a discussion is not worthwhile and you can do with a contribution from the world. Critics are not so tired, the golden rule hervorzuzerren as scapegoats, which we forget this game misconduct of the role culture never. Just as the supporters, who never tire of trying to pull something positive from it.
Inspired by PiHalbe Golden Rule-corpse desecration to the peaceful Christmas time, where you can find in the comments all the other branches for discussion, older and more recent, I would like to stress a little misunderstanding, which both parties are basically right.
The problem in this discussion is that the golden rule earlier, before not too long ago still around as a spontaneous carts during of league play has been understood. And as such it has no advantages, except as a sign of bad adventure and role-plays, namely when the group feels that it is necessary. What
but parallel to the defense of the golden rule, the question now, is a cautious, deliberate modification of the rules. So the replacement of existing rules by other applicable rules. This completely contradicts the former (?) Understanding of the game Storyteller wave, the rules in principle, as can be regarded a necessary evil, the dramatic unfolding of the story (tm) are first broken in the way and at any time (not) being modified.
Accordingly, the "Craft call" not serve as a defense of the golden rule. For the understanding and adapting and changing of rules in other rules ladies and gentlemen, is called House rules and is a normal, legitimate process to a role-play to the individual focus of a round match and has do so first to do anything with the golden rule .
even if such a reference in RPG books is basically a moot point, but certainly its right to exist in chapters for beginners addressed.
I wish all a happy, stress-free Christmas!
I did not expect to write something for golden rule. And I write on such matters only slightly, if a discussion is not worthwhile and you can do with a contribution from the world. Critics are not so tired, the golden rule hervorzuzerren as scapegoats, which we forget this game misconduct of the role culture never. Just as the supporters, who never tire of trying to pull something positive from it.
Inspired by PiHalbe Golden Rule-corpse desecration to the peaceful Christmas time, where you can find in the comments all the other branches for discussion, older and more recent, I would like to stress a little misunderstanding, which both parties are basically right.
The problem in this discussion is that the golden rule earlier, before not too long ago still around as a spontaneous carts during of league play has been understood. And as such it has no advantages, except as a sign of bad adventure and role-plays, namely when the group feels that it is necessary. What
but parallel to the defense of the golden rule, the question now, is a cautious, deliberate modification of the rules. So the replacement of existing rules by other applicable rules. This completely contradicts the former (?) Understanding of the game Storyteller wave, the rules in principle, as can be regarded a necessary evil, the dramatic unfolding of the story (tm) are first broken in the way and at any time (not) being modified.
Accordingly, the "Craft call" not serve as a defense of the golden rule. For the understanding and adapting and changing of rules in other rules ladies and gentlemen, is called House rules and is a normal, legitimate process to a role-play to the individual focus of a round match and has do so first to do anything with the golden rule .
even if such a reference in RPG books is basically a moot point, but certainly its right to exist in chapters for beginners addressed.
I wish all a happy, stress-free Christmas!
0 comments:
Post a Comment